Wednesday, 25 May 2016

FRENCH NAVAL INNOVATIONS, YEARS AHEAD OF THEIR TIME.




We all heard of the once mighty British navy “ships, more ships, still more ships” as exclaimed King Henri VIII who understood that the navy is what will guard the island nation & prevent any potential foreign invaders. (Incidentally, it was the British navy & the use of artillery which allowed the frigging British to steal many Spanish colonies and invade so many foreign countries which became part of the British Colonial Empire).
However what is lesser known is that French naval design & engineering was second to none during the Age of Sail, from the middle of the 17th century (when the type emerged) until the close of the sailing era in the middle of the 19th century. I propose to introduce the reader to 2 French naval innovations:

  1. THE SAILING FREGATE (FRIGATE IN ENGLISH)

La boudeuse -26 guns fregate of Louis Antoine de Bougainville 


  1. THE FIRST TRUE STEAM BATTLESHIP, AND THE FIRST SCREW BATTLESHIP EVER

Later on I shall mention a more modern French naval innovation.

  1. THE FREGATE

Early French naval frigates, until the 1740s, comprises two distinct groups. The larger types were the frégates-vaisseau, with batteries of guns spread over two decks; these were subdivided into frégates du premier ordre or vaisseau du quatrième rang (French Fourth Rates) usually with a lower deck battery of 12-pounder guns, and an upper deck battery of either 8-pounder or 6-pounder guns; and frégates du deuxième ordre or vaisseau du cinquième rang (French Fifth Rates) with a lower deck batter of 8-pounder guns, and an upper deck battery of either 6-pounder or 4-pounder guns. The smaller types were the frégates légères, with a single battery of (usually) 6-pounder or 4-pounder guns, plus a few small guns on its superstructure or gaillards. The 'modern' sail frigate, with its main battery on the upper deck, and no ports along the lower deck, emerged at the start of the 1740s.
Photographs
The Marquis de Lafayette sailed across the Atlantic to America aboard the original Hermione in 1780 and joined the American rebels in their struggle for independence from Great Britain.

Replica (showing the modern French flag) of the Fregate HERMIONE when the Marquis de Lafayette sailed to America to help Washington beat the English





France's Royal flag of the Bourbon at the time of the Marquis de Lafayette





Marquis de Lafayette at the battle of Yorktown









Battle between the French warship Droits de l'Homme and the British frigates Amazon and Indefatigable, 13 & 14 January 1797. (Indefatigable on the left, Droits de l'Homme at the centre, Amazon on the right.)

Design and construction
In general, French frigates were more lightly built than their British equivalents. French designs were often highly prized by the Royal Navy, which copied the designs of a number of the French frigates that they captured, and built a quantity of vessels to the same designs.

Frigates of the 1st Order (or 4th Rank Vessels)


These were two-decked ships - 74 cannons - usually carrying 12-pounder guns in their lower deck battery, and generally an upper deck battery of 6-pounders (although there were exceptions to these calibres). They were classed as fourth rank vessels (vaisseaux du quatrième rang). While not rated as ships of the line, inevitably several of these frigates not infrequently found themselves taking a place in the line of battle, although their main function was for cruising and for trade protection/attack.

Light Frigates (Frégates légères)


These were single-decked unranked ships (i.e. classified as below the cinqième rang), carrying a battery of 6-pounder or 8-pounder guns on their sole gundeck. An estimated 162 of these were placed in service between 1661 and 1715,


By Ambroise-Louis Garneray - Relation complète du naufrage de la frégate La Méduse faisant partie de l'expédition du Sénégal en 1816, by A. Correard, H. Savigny, D'Anglas de Praviel and Paul C.L. Alexandre Rand des Adrets (dit Sander Rang). Reprint 1968 by Jean de Bonnot éditeur., Public Domain,



single deck fregate


             ________________________________



2. THE FIRST STEAM BATTLESHIP IN THE WORLD


The Napoléon was a 90-gun ship of the line of the French Navy, and the first purpose-built steam battleship in the world.[1] She is also considered the first true steam battleship, and the first screw battleship ever.[2]
Launched in 1850, she was the lead ship of a class of 9 battleships, all built over a period of 10 years. This class of ship was designed by the famous naval designer Henri Dupuy de Lôme. She was originally to be named Prince de Joinville, in honour of François d'Orléans, Prince of Joinville, but was renamed 24 Février during the French Second Republic to celebrate the abdication of Louis Philippe I, and later to Napoléon in May 1850, a few days after her launch. The Prince of Joinville mentioned the incident in his Vieux Souvenirs
THE NAPOLEON French 90-gun ship of the line off Toulon in 1852. She was the first ever steam battleship and mounted 90 guns. Taken out of service in 1876.



"Dupuy de Lôme conceived and carried out the bolder scheme of designing a full-powered screw liner, and in 1847 Le Napoléon was ordered. Her success made the steam reconstruction of the fleets of the world a necessity. She was launched in 1850, tried in 1852, and attained a speed of nearly 14 knots (26 km/h). During the Crimean War her performances attracted great attention, and the type she represented was largely increased in numbers. She was about 240 ft (73 m). in length, 55 ft (17 m). in breadth, and of 5,000 tons displacement, with two gun decks. In her design boldness and prudence were well combined. The good qualities of the sailing line-of-battle ships which had been secured by the genius of Sané and his colleagues were maintained; while the new conditions involved in the introduction of steam power and large coal supply were thoroughly fulfilled
               _____________________________________


 
Stanislas Charles Henri Dupuy de Lôme (15 October 1816 – 1 February 1885) was a French naval architect. He was the son of a naval officer and was born in Ploemeur near Lorient, Brittany, in western France. He was educated at the École Polytechnique and ENSTA. He was particularly active during the 1840–1870 period. After finishing his professional education, he went to England about 1842, and made a thorough study of iron shipbuilding and steam navigation. He wrote a report, subsequently published under the title of Mémoire sur la construction des bâtiments en Fer in 1844.


PARENTHESIS ABOUT ARISTOCRACY.
Aristocrats bear titles ( baron, viscount, marquess, etc), but their surnames are an indication of noble birth. In France & Belgium, it is the “de” (in small letters followed by a space) + surname; the “de' is called “la particule” e.g. de Lasalle (explorer), de Champlain (explorer), de Richelieu (statesman), de Cadillac (explorer & founder of city of DETROIT, de Montesquieu (social philosopher), de Montcalm (military), de Lafayette, de Rochambeau (US independence), de Robespierre (revolutionary), de Talleyrand (Napoleon's foreign minister) de Cambronne (general of Napoleon's Imperial Guards) and thousands over the past centuries and of course the greatest Frenchman of all time Charles de Gaulle. In Germany “la particule” is the “von” (in small letters) e.g. von Bismarck, von Leeb, von Manstein, von Braun, von Zeppelin, von Hindenburg, Doris von Kappelhoff (US actrice Doris Day's birth name), von Richtoffen (the Red Baron - WWI ace flyer - his Albatroos triplane was painted RED and he was a German Baron) and thousand others. In fact, though it maybe a politically brutal statement, but the history of every European nation is first & foremost the history of its nobility WHY? Because they own the lands, great wealth, were cultured, educated and held all important positions. This business of democracy and the rise of the middle-class to Government/business executive positions is barely 100 years old. It started after the Great War (1914-1918).
END OF PARENTHESIS. 
        _________________________________________

3. ANOTHER FRENCH NAVAL INNOVATION

The largest submarine ever built in WW II (notice the plane on the deck)

Surcouf was a French cruiser submarine ordered to be built in December 1927, launched on 18 October 1929, and commissioned in May 1934. Surcouf – named after the French privateer Robert Surcouf – was the largest submarine ever built until surpassed by the first Japanese I-400-class submarine in 1943. Her short wartime career was marked with controversy and conspiracy theories. She was classified as an "undersea cruiser" by sources of her time. Its displacement was 3200tons i.e. 5 times bigger than conventional submarines in existence whose displacement was around 600 tonnes. The SURCOUF required a crew of 110–130 men, which represented three crews of more conventional submarines.

Surcouf had plenty of innovations: It was designed as an "underwater cruiser", intended to seek and engage in surface combat. For reconnaissance, she carried a Besson MB.411 observation floatplane in a hangar built abaft of the conning tower; for combat, she was armed with six 550 mm (22 in) and four 400 mm (16 in) torpedo tubes and twin 203 mm (8 in) guns in a pressure-tight turret forward of the conning tower. The guns were fed from a magazine holding 60 rounds and controlled by a director with a 5 m (16 ft) rangefinder, mounted high enough to view a 11 km (5.9 nmi; 6.8 mi) horizon, and able to fire within three minutes after surfacing. Using her periscopes to direct the fire of her main guns, Surcouf could increase this range to 16 km (8.6 nmi; 9.9 mi); originally an elevating platform was supposed to lift lookouts 15 m (49 ft) high, but this design was abandoned quickly due to the effect of roll.[3] In theory, the Besson observation plane could be used to direct fire out to the guns' 24 mi (21 nmi; 39 km) maximum range. Anti-aircraft cannon and machine guns were mounted on the top of the hangar.
Surcouf also carried a 4.5 m (14 ft 9 in) motorboat, and contained a cargo compartment with fittings to restrain 40 prisoners. The submarine's fuel tanks were very large; enough fuel for a 10,000 nmi (19,000 km; 12,000 mi) range and supplies for 90-day patrols could be carried.




Cruiser submarine
Displacement:
  • 3,250 long tons (3,300 t) (surfaced)
  • 4,304 long tons (4,373 t) (submerged)
  • 2,880 long tons (2,930 t) (dead)
submarine was that it required a crew of 110–130 men, which represented three crews of more conventional submarines

Fate

Surcouf may have been sunk on 18 February 1942 about 80 mi (70 nmi; 130 km) north of Cristóbal, Colón, while en route for Tahiti via the Panama Canal. The American freighter Thompson Lykes, steaming alone from Guantanamo Bay on what was a very dark night, reported hitting and running down a partially submerged object which scraped along her side and keel. Her lookouts heard people in the water but the freighter carried on its course without stopping, as they thought that they had struck a German U-boat, though cries for help were heard in English. A signal was sent to Panama describing the incident.[8][9] The loss of Surcouf was announced by the Free French Headquarters in London on 18 April 1942.[10]
Inquiries into the incident were haphazard and late, while a later French inquiry supported the idea that the sinking had been due to "friendly fire"; this conclusion was supported by Rear Admiral Auphan in his book The French Navy in World War II[11] in which he states: "for reasons which appear to have been primarily political, she was rammed at night in the Caribbean by an American freighter." Charles de Gaulle stated in his memoirs[12] that Surcouf "had sunk with all hands".
As no one has officially dived or verified the wreck of Surcouf, its location is unknown. If one assumes the Thompson Lykes incident was indeed the event of Surcouf's sinking, then the wreck would lie 3,000 m (9,800 ft) deep at 10°40′N 79°32′WCoordinates: 10°40′N 79°32′W.[2]
There is a memorial to Surcouf in Cherbourg harbor.

Theories on the loss of Surcouf

As there is no conclusive confirmation that Thompson Lykes collided with Surcouf, and her wreck has yet to be discovered, there are alternative stories of her fate.
Disregarding the predictable story about her being swallowed by the Bermuda Triangle, one of the most popular is that she was caught in Long Island Sound refuelling a German U-boat, and both submarines were sunk, either by the American submarines USS Mackerel and Marlin,[13] or a United States Coast Guard blimp.
In response to the above theory, Captain Julius Grigore, Jr., USNR (Retired) has offered a one million dollar prize to anyone who can prove that Surcouf engaged in activities which were detrimental to the Allied cause. The prize has yet to be claimed.
James Rusbridger examined some of the theories in his book Who Sank Surcouf?, finding them all easily dismissed except one: the records of the 6th Heavy Bomber Group operating out of Panama show them sinking a large submarine the morning of 19 February. Since no German submarine was lost in the area on that date, it could have been Surcouf. He suggested that the collision had damaged Surcouf's radio and the stricken boat limped towards Panama hoping for the best



official photo of the cruiser submarine
SURCOUF

Sunday, 10 April 2016

THE TRAGIC DESTINY OF THE LAST MUGHAL EMPEROR OF INDIA - Mirza Abu Zafar Sirajuddin Muhammad Bahadur Shah Zafar



PREAMBULE & BACKGROUND

The Timurid dynasty (Persian: تیموریان‎‎), self-designated as Gurkani (Persian: گورکانیان‎‎, Gūrkāniyān), was a Sunni Muslim dynasty or clan of Turco-Mongol lineage descended from the warlord Timur (also known as Tamerlane). The word "Gurkani" derived from "gurkan", a Persianized form of the Mongolian word "kuragan" meaning "son-in-law" as the Timurids being in-laws of the line of Genghis Khan
 

Timur -e-Lang - Tamerlane the lame empire

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=v21r5XtL1Mw#t=100

Timur e-lang (Tamerlane the lame) – founder of the TIMURID DYNASTY & EMPIRE - is a descendant of Genghis Khan ... Babur – founder of the MUGHAL DYNATY & EMPIRE is a descendant of Tamerlane.

MUGHAL



The Mughal Empire (Urdu: مغلیہ سلطن, Mug̱ẖliyah Salṭanat) or Mogul Empire self-designated as Gurkani (Persian: گورکانیان‎‎, Gūrkāniyān, meaning "son-in-law"), was an empire based in the Indian Subcontinent, established and ruled by a Muslim Persianate dynasty of Chagatai Turco-Mongol origin that extended over large parts of the Indian subcontinent and Afghanistan.
The beginning of the empire is conventionally dated to the founder Babur's victory over Ibrahim Lodi, the last ruler of the Delhi Sultanate in the First Battle of Panipat (1526). The Mughal emperors were Central Asian Turco-Mongols belonging to the Timurid dynasty, who claimed direct descent from both Genghis Khan (founder of the Mongol Empire, through his son Chagatai Khan) and Timur (Turco-Mongol conqueror who founded the Timurid Empire).

The Mughals were a Turko-Mongoloid people originating in the present-day country of Mongolia. Infact the word Mughal itself is a corruption of the word Mongol.
 
The "classic period" of the Mughal Empire started in 1556 with the ascension of Akbar the Great to the throne. Under the rule of Akbar and his son Jahangir, the region enjoyed economic progress as well as religious harmony, and the monarchs were interested in local religious and cultural traditions. Akbar was a successful warrior. He also forged alliances with several Hindu Rajput kingdoms. Some Rajput kingdoms continued to pose a significant threat to the Mughal dominance of northwestern India, but most of them were subdued by Akbar. All Mughal emperors were Muslims and adopted the Arbic alphabet which is the language of the KORAN.
The moons used on their flag(s) has little to do with islam, but infact a traditional symbol of Altaic peoples.
 

Though the Mughals/Mongols adopted Farsi and later Urdu as their official language, their original language was of Altaic origin, meaning it was related to Uzbek, Turkish, Mongolian and other Altaic languages.
Source:
 
 


FOUNDERS & CONQUERORS OF THE MUGHAL EMPIRE



Family Tree of Mughals


 

Emperor
 • 
1526–1530
Babur (first)
 • 
1837–1857
Bahadur Shah II (last


The following excerpt is a resume of the article posted by ­

Sarmad Rehman Lillah in 2014.

Bahadur Shah Zafar, the Ill-fated Last Mughal Emperor. The Mughal rule came to an end in India during the rule of the Timurid Dynasty. Among the emperors of the Timurid Dynasty, it was Mirza Abu Zafar Sirajuddin Muhammad Bahadur Shah Zafar who became the last Mughal ruler. His parents were Akbar II and a Hindu Rajuput woman named, Lal Bai. His father had died on September of 1837, and it was after this that he became the Mughal emperor. As he was also a significant Urdu poet, he used a part of his name, Zafar to serve as his nom de plume. The word Zafar means ‘victory’ and under this name he had earned a lot of fame by writing popular ghazals. In 1857, he was actively involved in the Indian Rebellion that had taken place, and for his active participation he was driven away from Delhi by the British. He was made to stay in Yangon, which is a part of Burma and used to be under the dominion of British. ­
Since the empire was already breaking down, Bahadur Shah’s empire was small and did not extend beyond Red Fort of Delhi. Even then, the East India Company was dominant over India both politically and as a military power. Other than the areas that were under the Company the land was divided into more than 300 small princely states (Maharajah, Rajah, Nizam, Nawab, Mir).
Crown of Bahadur Shah Zafar
The emperor however was respected by the Company and a certain amount of pension was paid to him. He even had the authority that let him collect taxes and also keep a military force. He was himself very relaxed about the political state of his empire.
He was more famous for being an Urdu poet than for being a ruler, and he even had written many ghazals in Urdu. In the Rebellion of 1857, most of his opus got lost and utterly destroyed. Though some of his collection did get saved from the wrath of the British. This collection was called the Kulliyyat-i-Zafar. Bahadur is always considered as one of the first and foremost fighters of Indian Independence, who was made the Commander-in-Chief for his constant attempts to fight for the independence of India. He even stayed calm and composed when the Major of that time, Hudson used to send him the slain heads of the emperor’s sons.




The Sepoy rebellion of 1857.


The Indian Rebellion of 1857 occurred as the result of an accumulation of factors over time, rather than any single event. The Sepoys were local soldiers, the majority Hindus or Muslims, who were recruited into the Company's army.         



 

Heroic Figures of 1857, the first Indian war of independence.

Bahadur Shah Zafar

Bahadur Shah Zafar:
Most rebelling Indians accepted Bahadur Shah Zafar as the Emperor of India under whom they united. But he fell to the wily machinations of the British. His fall marked the end of more than three centuries of Mughal rule in India.

Bakht Khan:
Bakht Khan, a subedar in the army of the East India Company, built up an army of Rohilla sepoys. After sepoys in Meerut revolted against the British in May 1857, he became commander of the sepoy forces in Delhi.

Mangal Pandey

Mangal Pandey: Mangal Pandey, part of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry, is primarily known for his involvement in attack on his senior British officers on 29th March 1857 at Barrackpore, an incident that marked the beginning of the First War of Indian Independence.

Nana Sahib:
Nana Sahib, the adopted son of exiled Maratha Peshwa Baji Rao II, led the revolt at Kanpur.

Nana Sahib

Rani Lakshmibai

Rani Lakshmibai:
She fought valiantly against the British troops along with Tatya Tope. However, on the 17th of June 1858, while battling against the British near the Phool Bagh area of Gwalior, she laid down her life.

Tatya Tope:
Tatya Tope, a close associate and general of Nana Sahib, fought against the British and joined forced with Rani Lakshmibai.

Tatya Tope

Veer Kunwar Singh

Veer Kunwar Singh:
The king of Jagdispur, currently a part of Bhojpur district, Bihar, Veer Kunwar Singh, led armed soldiers against the British troops.

_________________________________



After a four-month siege of Delhi during the Sepoy Mutiny, the city had been recaptured by the British in September 1857. Russel, from the Times newspaper in London was visiting Delhi at the time of the trial at the Red Fort of the last of the Great Mughals. He was taken through “a dark and dingy back passage” of the fort to see Bahadur Shah Zafar, who was detained in a small cell, accused of being the mastermind of the uprising. He wondered whether the old and feeble man with dim eyes could conceive the vast plan of restoring a great empire and fomenting the most gigantic mutiny in the history of the world.



Bahadur Shah Zafar arrested by British captain HUDSON


PHOTO OF BRITISH CRUELTY






             







Emperor Bahadur detained by British soldiers

“Not a word came from his lips, in silence he sat day and night with eyes cast on the ground, and as though utterly oblivious of the conditions in which he was placed..”
An English lawyer in an English court of justice might show that it would be very difficult for our government to draw an indictment against the King of Delhi for treason, for levying of war against us as lords paramount….”Willliam Howard Russel, The Times

 
Mirza Mughal son of Bahadur Shah II Zafar. Mirza Mughal was the fifth son of Bahadur Shah Zafar, the 12th and last Mughal emperor. His mother, Sharif-ul-Mahal Sayyidini, came from an aristocratic Sayyid family that claimed descent from Prophet Muhammad. Following the death in 1856 of his elder step-brother Mirza Fakhru, Mirza Mughal became the eldest surviving legitimately born son of Bahadur Shah Zafar. He was one of the three princes killed by Hudson after the fall of Delhi in 1857.



Bahadur Shah has written beautiful poems, and all his ghazals are an exquisite compilation that comprises of majestic words. One is teleported to another magical world while reading them, and one feels admiration for the works of this noble warrior. Though he is often thought to be one of the weakest Mughal emperor, it is indeed his terrible fate that caused him to be in such a situation. He is otherwise a man of extreme talent and verbosity. In modern New Delhi, there is a road that is particularly named after this emperor. His contribution to the struggle of India’s freedom is great, and it is valued and spoke highly of by all Indians. He is known as the first nationalist of India for valid reasons.
 His empire was in a constant of chaos and turmoil as he was not very capable as a ruler. Later in his life he was defeated by the British and sent away from his country to live in Rangoon. The tomb was built for him in the year 1862, and this tomb still exists.
­
 
He is moreover remembered for never making any disparity between the two religions of Hinduism and Islam. He even kept in check the extremist attitude of the many orthodox ulemas of Islam. The philosophy that was followed by the people during his reign was that of harmony between the two religions. This was practiced to such an extent that even the Hindus had grown to become fond of poetry (shayris and ghazals)
  
Bahadur Shah Zafar II: The Last Mughal Emperor, dethroned by the British. The last Mughal emperor was deposed in 1858 by the British East India company and exiled to Burma following the War of 1857 after the fall of Delhi to the company troops. His death marks the end of the Mughal dynasty         
        _____________________________


Bahadur Shah Zafar with 2 sons in his palace in Delhi.
 
Bahadur Shah Zafar was sentenced “to be transported for the remainder of his days, either to one of the Andaman Islands or to such other place as may be selected by the Governor General in council.” There was a seven-month delay in arranging for Zafar’s exile due to the time needed to select a suitable place and the fact that fighting had not completely ceased in the eastern part of the country. Even though his final destination had not yet been decided, on October 7, 1858, 332 years after Babur’s conquest of the city, the last Mughal Emperor left Delhi on a bullock cart, accompanied by his wives, his two remaining sons and servants. Bahadur Shah Zafar’s twomonth long journey by land, river and sea ended in Rangoon, where he lived in captivity until his death in 1862.

William Dalrymple’s book, “The Last Mughal” published in 2007, gives a detailed and vivid account of the Mutiny-city by city and battle by battle

Bahadur Shah Zafar was a poet and calligrapher of much fame. Hence during his imprisonment when he wasn’t given pen and paper to write on, he had opted to write on the walls instead.
 
 

The ghazal that he wrote for his own epitaph is still remembered by many for its last couplet:

 

“ Kitna bad naseeb hai Zafar dafan kay liye,


Do gazz zameen bhi na mili koo e yaar main”
[How ill-fated is Zafar that even for his burial, He couldn’t be granted a place for the grave in the city of his loved one.]

http://muslim-academy.com/bahadur-shah-zafar-ill-fated-last-mughal-emperor/#sthash.u26fgSmh.dpuf
       ___________________________________

Tomb of Bahadur Shah Zafar



This is the resting place of the last Mughal Emperor of India. The head priest there will give you a tour and show the graves of his wife and his sons. The grave of the emperor being on a lower level was found much later in the 19th century.




BAHADUR, his wife ZEENAT and the last two of his sons are buried there in Rangoon.










Picture of his favorite young wife ZEENAT as a young girl WHO LIVED WITH HIM IN EXILE AND DIED A FEW YEARS LATER.
















Picture of his last 2 younger sons who died in Rangoon, also a few years later.

 
 
 
         ________________________________________________
 
 


The Indian Prime Minister in a generous & respectful act attend prayers at the tomb of Bahadur Shah Zafar in Rangoon.
 

 

commemorative stamp honoring his memory.

 



 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

AUTOGRAPH OF BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
THAT'S HOW QUEEN VICTORIA BECAME EMPRESS OF INDIA IN 1877 BY DECLARATION OF BRITISH PRIME MINISTER (the sinister) BENJAMIN DISRAELI.